Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] CFI: All is Not Made Right.

[Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 04:04:30 +0000, Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:54:05PM -0500, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:39:49 -0600, Araltaln <araltaln@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 22:21:35 -0500, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Well, obviously I'm not capable of that, since I'm still not convinced
> > > > that they weren't legal even without this scam. Anyway, it doesn't
> > > > matter whether I can figure it out now; the important thing is whether
> > > > I could figure it out then, and it seems I couldn't.
> > > >
> > > > And even if I had, you'd have no way of knowing.
> > >
> > > You knew to invoke r699 when you originally attempted the actions, I'd
> > > argue that that indicates you knew they weren't legal.
> >
> > It also implies he knew it'd be legal if he used r699.
> 
> But he hadn't used it yet. I appeal this.

Technically speaking, you don't use r699. Wonko was just explaining
why it was legal to the rest of us.

-- 
bd
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss