shadowfirebird on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:12:16 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Optional voting (sic) |
> Interesting. If that's the case, it's ambiguous whether a submission > is an amendment or a new proposal. At the very least, it makes it > harder on me if when I get a message I need to go back to see if there > may be something with the same name that may be amended instead of the > message being a new proposal. I agree. I'm trying to propose a change in fact. (Although perhaps that will be trumped by the auto-proposal system...) > I think I'm going to keep this as a > separate prop for now, especially as it seems a reasonable way to take > your message, and it may makes things easier as it involves less > changes now that people are voting. Fair enough. Since the prop in question was to simply to amend a minor typo I'm not going to worry about that. > As long as the target of an action is unambiguous, I think the rules > (and game custom) allow it to be an acceptable method of performing > it. Brilliant. I'll let my original vote stand then. Ta for the clarification. Optional. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business