Re: [eia] Russian repatriation

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    We have definitely had some trouble with the word "friendly" in the 
past.  In some places it seems to mean the same as "controlled by you", but 
in other places it seems to mean "allied with you or controlled by you."
    Under either interpretation, though, Prussian forces are not "friendly" 
to Russian forces.  Hence, they would negate your cossacks for the purposes 
of cutting supply.
    Here's the flavor text:  I guess the French are smart enough to place 
their depots near Prussian military bases to force those outlaw cossacks to 
keep their distance.  After all, aren't cossacks invaders even when two 
countries aren't at war?  If you were a Prussian garrison, wouldn't you 
shoot on sight any roving band of foreign cavalry on your soil without 
permission?  Especially since they are thieves.  (They aren't receiving 
supply, so they must be "foraging" supplies from the local population - i.e. 
stealing.)

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Russian repatriation


> Question:  would Prussian garrisons still prevent my cossacks from cutting
> French supply lines ?
>
> The rules say that supply is not cut if a "friendly" corps or garrison is 
> in
> the same area.  But I thought that this game's definition of "friendly" 
> was
> your own major power's forces and those of the minor countries you 
> control.
> We may have been playing this incorrectly.
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [eia] Russian repatriation
>
>
>> Going back over the records I find that a majority of the present players
>> (Joel, Mike, Jim, and myself, who in fact were everyone that voted at the
>> time) were in favor of using the Limited Access rules after a peace when
> we
>> were starting the current game in late July last year.  So throw out the
>> repatriated map I sent.
>>
>> -JJY
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
>> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 7:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: [eia] Russian repatriation
>>
>>
>> > At 10:39 PM 7/23/2006, you wrote:
>> > >The I corps at Danzig and Konigsberg are moved to the area W of Kovno.
>> > >
>> > >The depot at Danzig is removed from the map.
>> > >
>> > >The cossack S of Konigsberg is moved to Brest-Litovsk.
>> > >
>> > >The cossack at Kustrin is moved to Hamburg.
>> > >
>> > >-JJY
>> >
>> > Repatriation?  Since when were we not using the access after peace 
>> > rules
>> > this time?
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > eia mailing list
>> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eia mailing list
>> eia@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia