Re: [eia] political points after a battle

["Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Or we could slap ourselves in the head and actually read the rules
concerning lapse of war with minor countries (4.6.6) where it says: "Any garrisons, cossacks and/or freikorps are repatriated as per 4.4.6.2."

-Everett


On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:38:50 -0400
"Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>     Yes, you are right that 10.3.3 does not apply to the situation we are
> describing.  But of course, neither does 12.4 (which specifically deals with
> the effects of a Peace Treaty).
>     So basically we are asking ourselves what model makes the most sense for
> the situation in which a minor country reverts to neutrality.  Should a
> corps have to be dispatched to go back and pick the garrison up (as
> described in 12.4)?  Or should we just use the "force repatriation" model
> (as found in 10.3.3 and 4.4.6.2)?
>     I thought the force repatriation model made sense because when a minor
> country reverts to neutrality, I imagine that as a coup in which the major
> power garrison is expelled from the country.  It's hard for me to imagine
> that the locals would allow the garrison to sit there for months on end...
> Plus, the force repatriation model avoids the oddness of having a foreign
> army march into a formerly controlled country without reclaiming it.
>     But at the end of the day, I really don't care that much.  The model
> provided by Rule 12.4 is fine by me.
> 
> kdh
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 7:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] political points after a battle
> 
> 
> > I read 10.3.3 as a fix to keep two nations that aren't at war from
> > fighting each other.  I don't really see how it would apply or make
> > sense in a non-combat situation.
> >
> > -Everett
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:09:48 -0400
> > "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >     Actually, what about the rules in 10.3.3?  Honestly, I think that's
> the
> > > easiest and simplest way to go.
> > >
> > > kdh
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 6:52 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [eia] political points after a battle
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > >    As I recall, JJ and I have mentioned another issue to each
> other in
> > > > > >conversation that should also be resolved.  Namely, what happens to
> a
> > > > > >garrison
> > > > > >that is in a country that reverts to neutrality?  Does anyone know
> of
> > > the
> > > > > >specific rule for that eventuality?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >kdh
> > > > >
> > > > > I would expect it to be handled as if the two nations had just made
> > > > > peace.  Which is useless as the access conditions after peace are
> > > > > completely undefined in the game.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > What about the rules under 12.4?
> > > >
> > > > -Everett
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > eia mailing list
> > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> > --
> > Everett E. Proctor <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Play Sanctum: Online CCG
> > http://www.sanctum.nioga.net/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

-- 
Everett E. Proctor <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Play Sanctum: Online CCG
http://www.sanctum.nioga.net/


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia