Re: [eia] political points after a battle

["Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I read 10.3.3 as a fix to keep two nations that aren't at war from
fighting each other.  I don't really see how it would apply or make
sense in a non-combat situation. 

-Everett

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:09:48 -0400
"Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>     Actually, what about the rules in 10.3.3?  Honestly, I think that's the
> easiest and simplest way to go.
> 
> kdh
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 6:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] political points after a battle
> 
> 
> >
> > > >    As I recall, JJ and I have mentioned another issue to each other in
> > > >conversation that should also be resolved.  Namely, what happens to a
> > > >garrison
> > > >that is in a country that reverts to neutrality?  Does anyone know of
> the
> > > >specific rule for that eventuality?
> > > >
> > > >kdh
> > >
> > > I would expect it to be handled as if the two nations had just made
> > > peace.  Which is useless as the access conditions after peace are
> > > completely undefined in the game.
> > >
> >
> > What about the rules under 12.4?
> >
> > -Everett
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

-- 
Everett E. Proctor <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Play Sanctum: Online CCG
http://www.sanctum.nioga.net/


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia