Re: [eia] I still have a problem

["Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I still think it will still slow down the game incredibly, but if that's
the way everyone wants to do it, it's fine with me.

For example:

I decide to join the war.   I have to *not* send in my orders.  I have
to send a message to all the allies saying that I want combined movement.  I have to wait for all of them to change their orders, and then to reply back that they have changed their orders.  Then I can send
in my orders.  I think this would have added several days to the phase,
but I'd be satisfied if Joel would make this change.

-Everett





On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 15:40:59 -0500
"Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>     Great!  I think that's a great idea, Joel.  Thanks for suggesting it.
> That should make people a bit less fearful about sending out orders to an
> escrow (if they know they can fix mistakes until the last person responds).
> Everett, would this solution eliminate some of your concerns about using the
> escrow for combined movement?
> 
> kdh
> 
> > I can do something about that. It would be trivial to change the escrow so
> > that it will accept revised orders until the last set of orders is in.
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

-- 
Everett E. Proctor <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Play Sanctum: Online CCG
http://www.sanctum.nioga.net/


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia