Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:24:19 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers


On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> The text from that earlier version:
>
> "A Potential Sockholder may become a member of this contract by
> announcement or by purchasing a Black sock."
>
> I had already purched a black sock, automatically wrapping me into
> membership -- one interpretation.


That earlier version only existed after you purchased a Black sock. Before
that, the "or by purchasing a Black sock" part was absent. I added it in
after becoming a member by announcement, and subsequently Ty-Guy 6 and then
0x44 became members.


> If socks survive my last email I plan to file a consultation around this
> fuzziness.


This is a good point. That challenge might actually be valid :-S

If the corps do exist, we really should submit something in Black Corp to
clear up this whole member business.

If the corps don't exist, we need some sort of emergency or at least a
ratification of Public Displays, rather than tediously attempting to
backtrack gamestate.

Good play,

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss