Rainbow Wolfe on Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:45:59 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] THE MOST NOBLE AND RESPECTABLE RULESET OF THE NOMIC FORMERLY KNOWN AS B: |
Turiski sent an update to the game before you sent yours. When I sent my changes I correlated both together which included deleting the rule in question. You should have the mail/thread if you look back. - Rainbow Wolfe On 23 September 2011 21:12, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 0x44 implicitly supported it when e created the rule. E also acted on > behalf of 0x44 to support it in the same message that defined the rule. > > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Arkady English wrote: > > > That's not the source of my confusion...at what point did 0x44 support > > a second time? I also missed Turiski disfavoring it. > > > > On 23 September 2011 19:54, Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> We have currently 11 players, 3 and a bit players would be a third. Your > >> interpretation is quite correct but the rule would not have existed, or > >> should not have existed for anyone else to object to. By your rule we > would > >> have needed part of another player to object which would not be > technically > >> possible. > >> > >> - Rainbow Wolfe > >> > >> On 22 September 2011 22:11, Arkady English <arkadyenglish@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 22 September 2011 21:58, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 21:45 +0100, Rainbow Wolfe wrote: > >>>>> 26. The creation of a rule fails if a third of the players object to > it > >>>>> in the week following its creation. > >>>>> [[Value = -1 (INVALID) > >>>>> 0x44 +1, 0x44 +1, Turiski -1, Rainbow Wolfe -1, Arkady -1]] > >>>> > >>>> Didn't Arkady just create a time paradox with that? -1ing a rule > >>>> probably counts as objecting to it, and the rule was quite valid when > >>>> creating it, so the third -1 would retroactively cause the creation of > >>>> the rule that allowed creations of rules to retroactively fail to > fail. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> ? > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> spoon-discuss mailing list > >>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > >>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > >>>> > >>> > >>> I should point out that I did explicitly disfavor rule 26. > >>> > >>> Also, when I disfavored it, I'm pretty sure it was at +1. > >>> > >>> So I don't think I caused a time paradox. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> spoon-discuss mailing list > >>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > >>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Hobbes: Why are you digging a hole? > >> > >> Calvin: I'm looking for buried treasure. > >> > >> Hobbes: What have you found? > >> > >> Calvin: A few dirty rocks, a weird root, and some disgusting grubs. > >> > >> Hobbes: On your first try? > >> > >> Calvin: There's treasure everywhere! > >> _______________________________________________ > >> spoon-discuss mailing list > >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- Hobbes: Why are you digging a hole? Calvin: I'm looking for buried treasure. Hobbes: What have you found? Calvin: A few dirty rocks, a weird root, and some disgusting grubs. Hobbes: On your first try? Calvin: There's treasure everywhere! _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss