Re: [s-d] [s-b] THE MOST NOBLE AND RESPECTABLE RULESET OF THE NOMIC FORMERLY KNOWN AS B:

[Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx>]

Okay, notes below.

- Rainbow Wolfe


> Per rule 18, rules 25 and 26 take precedence over 27. That means that even
> if rule 27 is VALID, rules 25 and 26 cannot be destroyed.
>

...or created, I'm no sure they should have a number as they exist in their
own bubbles of paradox.

>
> > "Also, all 0x44s support preventing "Two People are Two People" having
> > been created." I find this statement false since I also supported it
> before
> > it was voted against, it is however currently INVALID and only needs one
> > more vote either way to turn it back on or delete.
>
> I believe that we 0x44s were acting in accordance with 0x44's proposed
> rule that would prevent a rule from taking effect if 1/3 of players
> objected
> to it. That rule doesn't seem to exist in the below ruleset, which seems to
> me to be in error, as 0x44 implicitly supported the rule when e created it
> and 0x44 was acted on behalf of to support it.
>

26. The creation of a rule fails if a third of the players object to it
in the week following its creation.
[[Value = -1 (INVALID)
0x44 +1, 0x44 +1, Turiski -1, Rainbow Wolfe -1, Arkady -1]]

That is correct, although Turiski, myself and Arkady voted against and so it
was deleted.


>
> >
> > {{{
> > Title: Preventing Conflict
> > If two or more rules defer to each other, then the rule with the highest
> > value shall take take priority over the one with the lower value. If any
> > rules in conflict have the same value, then the rule with the lowest
> > identifying number takes precedence.
> > }}}
> >
>
> Rule 18 takes precedence over this rule, and therefore this rule has
> no effect. I disapprove of this rule.
>

This is meant to prevent conflict with existing rules, I read 18 as
rules being put into operation in the order they were proposed, rather than
one rule existing before previously proposed rules. Since they are being
created at present this may be irrelevant.


>
> > {{{
> > Title: 3 is the Key
> > Players may not submit more than a total of 3 rules, or rule changes, in
> a
> > consecutive manner. Other game actions must also follow this rule except
> > where they are governed by another similar rule.
> > }}}
>
> Rule 1 takes precedence over this rule, therefore I don't think this rule
> can
> prevent a Player from submitting any number of rules. I disapprove of this
> rule.
>

Fair nuff, just thought we should limit the number of rules proposed at any
one time since I could conceviably create an entire new ruleset that
nullifies the current one with the only check being that people can vote
against rules that are ALREADY in effect.


> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
Hobbes: Why are you digging a hole?

Calvin: I'm looking for buried treasure.

Hobbes: What have you found?

Calvin: A few dirty rocks, a weird root, and some disgusting grubs.

Hobbes: On your first try?

Calvin: There's treasure everywhere!
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss