| 0x44 on Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:20:02 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] THE MOST NOBLE AND RESPECTABLE RULESET OF THE NOMIC FORMERLY KNOWN AS B: |
0x44 implicitly supported it when e created the rule. E also acted on behalf of 0x44 to support it in the same message that defined the rule. On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Arkady English wrote: > That's not the source of my confusion...at what point did 0x44 support > a second time? I also missed Turiski disfavoring it. > > On 23 September 2011 19:54, Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> We have currently 11 players, 3 and a bit players would be a third. Your >> interpretation is quite correct but the rule would not have existed, or >> should not have existed for anyone else to object to. By your rule we would >> have needed part of another player to object which would not be technically >> possible. >> >> - Rainbow Wolfe >> >> On 22 September 2011 22:11, Arkady English <arkadyenglish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 22 September 2011 21:58, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 21:45 +0100, Rainbow Wolfe wrote: >>>>> 26. The creation of a rule fails if a third of the players object to it >>>>> in the week following its creation. >>>>> [[Value = -1 (INVALID) >>>>> 0x44 +1, 0x44 +1, Turiski -1, Rainbow Wolfe -1, Arkady -1]] >>>> >>>> Didn't Arkady just create a time paradox with that? -1ing a rule >>>> probably counts as objecting to it, and the rule was quite valid when >>>> creating it, so the third -1 would retroactively cause the creation of >>>> the rule that allowed creations of rules to retroactively fail to fail. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ? >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> spoon-discuss mailing list >>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >>>> >>> >>> I should point out that I did explicitly disfavor rule 26. >>> >>> Also, when I disfavored it, I'm pretty sure it was at +1. >>> >>> So I don't think I caused a time paradox. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spoon-discuss mailing list >>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hobbes: Why are you digging a hole? >> >> Calvin: I'm looking for buried treasure. >> >> Hobbes: What have you found? >> >> Calvin: A few dirty rocks, a weird root, and some disgusting grubs. >> >> Hobbes: On your first try? >> >> Calvin: There's treasure everywhere! >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss