0x44 on Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:20:02 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] THE MOST NOBLE AND RESPECTABLE RULESET OF THE NOMIC FORMERLY KNOWN AS B:


0x44 implicitly  supported it when e created the rule. E also acted on behalf of 0x44 to support it in the same message that defined the rule.


On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Arkady English wrote:

> That's not the source of my confusion...at what point did 0x44 support
> a second time? I also missed Turiski disfavoring it.
> 
> On 23 September 2011 19:54, Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> We have currently 11 players, 3 and a bit players would be a third. Your
>> interpretation is quite correct but the rule would not have existed, or
>> should not have existed for anyone else to object to. By your rule we would
>> have needed part of another player to object which would not be technically
>> possible.
>> 
>> - Rainbow Wolfe
>> 
>> On 22 September 2011 22:11, Arkady English <arkadyenglish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 22 September 2011 21:58, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 21:45 +0100, Rainbow Wolfe wrote:
>>>>> 26. The creation of a rule fails if a third of the players object to it
>>>>> in the week following its creation.
>>>>> [[Value = -1 (INVALID)
>>>>> 0x44 +1, 0x44 +1, Turiski -1, Rainbow Wolfe -1, Arkady -1]]
>>>> 
>>>> Didn't Arkady just create a time paradox with that? -1ing a rule
>>>> probably counts as objecting to it, and the rule was quite valid when
>>>> creating it, so the third -1 would retroactively cause the creation of
>>>> the rule that allowed creations of rules to retroactively fail to fail.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> ?
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I should point out that I did explicitly disfavor rule 26.
>>> 
>>> Also, when I disfavored it, I'm pretty sure it was at +1.
>>> 
>>> So I don't think I caused a time paradox.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Hobbes: Why are you digging a hole?
>> 
>> Calvin: I'm looking for buried treasure.
>> 
>> Hobbes: What have you found?
>> 
>> Calvin: A few dirty rocks, a weird root, and some disgusting grubs.
>> 
>> Hobbes: On your first try?
>> 
>> Calvin: There's treasure everywhere!
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss