Re: [s-d] [s-b] Initial Rules Set / Meta-Game - An Experiment in Thought Gaming

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 16:48 -0700, Eric Stucky wrote:
> >> I disfavor this rule. It is rather redundant. If two players object to
> >> any rule before anybody does not, it is automatically deleted.
> > I can't see any evidence for that statement in the ruleset.
> 
> Erm, by "does not" I mean "makes some positive comment toward," and I
> see those aren't the same. My bad. Evidence is Rule 22. It does need
> to be two because Rule 8 implies all rules start at +1.

I suppose the problem with that is that a rule can trivially ban its own
decrementing. At least my version causes a time paradox rather than a
dictatorship if someone tries that (in the Diplomacy meaning of
"paradox" which also includes situations where there are two
possibilities and which is correct is formally undecidable).

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss