Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Explo

Sean Hunt on Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:40:35 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
From: Sean Hunt <rideau3@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:02:32 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Os+ZhzHy9dTUsi9piPdx0Q1o82kX3uqSRSi6kJ1KXB8=; b=ZMdgUdOHRY1vaDvoqy8MyjvCyRcKFrRTGDqKqHJctQ73J/G1iGT1e6gWk4VdL4azu1 0pBceGtBoZXQWaEcOc31Ptl41xmyD+VpMUxvHhJpDdcnjuCxrQBQbKZL0pggrvd3gmhC fLFimM1IYBF9mWQ4u4AxYrYiD8jO67z3FQR0M=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=G0wQCHltiHJAAo2cSg6K5uT7hujv5VwibQyFs9bcpuWzGF53WMCj56EHiOknLzrO0r y1koNOwgf7KAkuvJmY7IlECQEdM9FTrsBbJHOOYNqOffQtldJ+hNkgN1cajBW1Zoc544 z0M2253jz9vdEvSklRAoLRq8ld8Jc5FHriLL8=
In-reply-to: <653283240911010957w54be865cj79462f0d7b49d3bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dc05cc2c0911010914n4072d3fbt75b88d096e97c213@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f0a8cd45831294b11fc09a3ed4274bec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0911010927g6caa541bked852e177f0da975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <446303605ba23b13a41399a70a2d0eab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0911010940k7ac0c31dn24edb0d9ebfba572@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911010957w54be865cj79462f0d7b49d3bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

Geoffrey Spear wrote:

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Charles Walker
<charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

2009/11/1 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

The rules don't define plenty of things which exist happily within B.

Such as?

We no longer have a definition of personhood, yet we still exist and
interact with the platonic gamestate happily enough. One big example
from Agora is acting on behalf- that was considered to work for ages
before they legislated it formally.


Agora game custom doesn't apply to B.

There's no reason to think that the common language definition of
"person" allows you to create them by writing a document.


Agreed. You need a corporate charter from the government.

-coppro
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
  - From: Charles Walker
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
  - From: Charles Walker
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [registrar] census for 01 Nov 2009.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread