Charles Walker on Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:40:47 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)


2009/11/1 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> The rules don't define plenty of things which exist happily within B.
>
> Such as?

We no longer have a definition of personhood, yet we still exist and
interact with the platonic gamestate happily enough. One big example
from Agora is acting on behalf- that was considered to work for ages
before they legislated it formally.

-- 
Charles Walker
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss