Charles Walker on Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:40:47 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE) |
2009/11/1 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> The rules don't define plenty of things which exist happily within B. > > Such as? We no longer have a definition of personhood, yet we still exist and interact with the platonic gamestate happily enough. One big example from Agora is acting on behalf- that was considered to work for ages before they legislated it formally. -- Charles Walker _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss