Charles Walker on Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:27:13 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)


2009/11/1 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:14:26 +0000, Charles Walker
> <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I agree to the following:
>>
>> {{
>>
>> This is a contract known as the CftPoPDE. It is a corporation owned by
>> Walker; e can act on its behalf.
>>
>> }}
>>
>> I act on behalf of the CftPoPDE to cause it to register itself.
>> (Disclaimer: I'm not sure if this works.)
>>
>> I CFJ on: The CftPoPDE is a player.
>
> B Nomic no longer has contracts.

It no longer has /rule-defined/ contracts. The rules don't define
plenty of things which exist happily within B. Other nomics have had
contracts without them being rule-defined before.

-- 
Charles Walker
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss