Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract for the Purposes of Personhood Definition Exploration (PftPoPDE)

[Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Charles Walker
<charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2009/11/1 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> The rules don't define plenty of things which exist happily within B.
>>
>> Such as?
>
> We no longer have a definition of personhood, yet we still exist and
> interact with the platonic gamestate happily enough. One big example
> from Agora is acting on behalf- that was considered to work for ages
> before they legislated it formally.

Agora game custom doesn't apply to B.

There's no reason to think that the common language definition of
"person" allows you to create them by writing a document.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss