Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 22:28 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/2/22 comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Someone explained it on IRC:
> >>
> >>  [[ a ]] b [[ c ]]
> >>       ^^   ^^ "b" is between this [[ and this ]]
> >
> > You can still play B if you grandfather in forgiveness for that
> > particular bug, stating that as it remains from a time when custom was
> > not always to treat things literally, we can follow the old custom
> > while interpreting old rules.
> 
> Even with a lenient interpretation, ]] b [[ is still between a [[ and
> a ]]. There
> isn't any way to weasel out of that. B is dead.

B as we know it is dead. Its actual gamestate, though, may still be
playable, it's just probably far too much effort to work out what it is.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss