Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating

Elliott Hird on Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:12:43 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:12:36 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BUzYjHPpXd91XCBUuHqnveoossceU93lIVHQCp2ZKXA=; b=S/0wDnFj0d1KfR3Gm7oPZWWKYnvAGc1FRwbO7zlbJ/YSgPsjfHX8LrMX/e67Lb0s4s 9sd21kMbqsL9DiHzNgA2FPXW3QljbZFL08LdDYgUzLzE7lmm152fksw5WH+lLV+CLKBV he8FYog9VvqdFABfRp9DWkszUNbui1Fe650to=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vwTHZjFjRIkpvVid/uSoe2GhUhcQzQPNDNwnlNF46SO7CYJoJJcUhHKX5y6TBo5mPQ 9qXHl0DKp7k0y05cGq1doLCIe3pKxGk5y4DZ/vI36VWGF82V32DMP9f4HzAulEv3/c4B if+mptHuZ+M0biyFo2uJnjNU5JMZqP76Y/vBQ=
In-reply-to: <49A1A9BF.2080000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240902201736m431d7f21h3320a0131eb462c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A19B98.3070600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902221050n2c3f4425j6c67bddc3bc5df2f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A19FE2.5000605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902221101t27ebfaa5y15cb2b3cadc8fb91@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A1A9BF.2080000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/22 Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> ehird wrote:
>
>> Did you miss the part where the non-greedy interpretation was found to
>> also break the game?
>
> I did.

Wooble posted it around half-way through this mess.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Ed Murphy

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] B Nomic Roll Call
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread