Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating

Ed Murphy on Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:38:16 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:38:39 -0800
In-reply-to: <784a579e0902221101t27ebfaa5y15cb2b3cadc8fb91@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240902201736m431d7f21h3320a0131eb462c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A19B98.3070600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902221050n2c3f4425j6c67bddc3bc5df2f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A19FE2.5000605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902221101t27ebfaa5y15cb2b3cadc8fb91@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

ehird wrote:

> Did you miss the part where the non-greedy interpretation was found to
> also break the game?

I did.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Elliott Hird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread