Elliott Hird on Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:01:27 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating |
2009/2/22 Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > The interpretation at hand is that B's comments are not "greedy regexp", > several B eras have indeed passed, several years of gameplay have actually > happened, and no Points of Order recently passed, due to the lack of any Yea > votes. The first three are plain sanity, the latter is disambiguating > pedantry. > > This allows the next nweek to begin. Unless you want to be obstructionist. > > j > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > Did you miss the part where the non-greedy interpretation was found to also break the game? la la la. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss