Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

Elliott Hird on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:14:36 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:14:30 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=t/NGyiAK51rGeoTHy7sLkarudJgnvNOzEtoZ6aS1spQ=; b=V8gSOB68PD+o3qjqiQasDFWSLw5Fhf1j2qlv3YrFerNajnUCj0bCUfYHb+4mIqeCcb dT4ICP5+mQ1+4FOvEJJLFDakp9eWn3WYKlcYphr5dsDnzyt1uIgonR+qtQ5KJaJnTOF2 /KfoV3w+8c+3du9M5iaxAa2F+LJgO9WjC5PGc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fuUQNBetTDg9mjrNnW0I1laqMPbaw+WW/3uU2ce9g84AxBvtNBep52BmEOK3onWJoW HvuQEyOy19pwnEq2PKvrqixEUDh+NN6y5yxFXGXKsk6nVRb0u17BY496/8InhGpooAWx PRRQfw344auoqzBwLCTIRlX+ZsEhxNSVXsFpw=
In-reply-to: <55b258c20902081923jc3a39f2y52a9a579ae275120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20902032200v7893c148we4bca2a86ab645ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902061404v337c251fj8f48bd1cdbab8f82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902061646j61c21da7w807b2292ac785513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902061940g55335124o691cc6abeb6538da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902070635s4b1c9f18u6b9326cae22bfa1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902080751n7a593aaehc3987fb923516984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902080918o71acca92me2c1d255fa872252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280902081155j482cf7as5acf95d30f380906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902081200j3d770d56y78d007ad27e3220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902081923jc3a39f2y52a9a579ae275120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/9 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Ah, you're right.
>
> Most of the stuff in there is should rather than shalls.

Right. And also see the last clause. This _is_ disruptive.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread