Elliott Hird on Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:19:05 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League


2009/2/8 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
> It doesn't actually forbid them. It says "should not but may", which I
> read as intending "should" in the Agoran sense.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>


Not in the original contract. In comex's, yes, but Warrigal's is shall.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss