Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

Elliott Hird on Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:19:05 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:18:59 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZvhW5uRhVw6RNlSoGua7bbmmzCuNpxvSQPmLZm0P9rU=; b=qksZzSgF5ybYqXymJyi4F3/9GgtsWchoWSdntVt7/7iH7/UKrF4YIlfaYNmIekfqAl w7kV7Ba/1X+ey9IdfHkWMXBOfGyxz2IU46y0j4JYpXizfpACvnpVXjKCJ/wfC0uhMfA8 ccH17H9XsHii4U/HuewoIzZieuC+tXAJP9bME=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LPfjzflWOyTkm77+MnY/QxoaOxAlGS7geypQ0vDzDZVJfrFPNbwAVVE2U1PYIzKI85 TU/YUhwGbjm0YaysJjhjGWojKPhXySDd36G2Ml70RVbKhCB2DS2vP2t3wzuBIncteS3X 4Ek2S2k+BG39tCXh1ujL+qCXNJtk6+6vkqNPw=
In-reply-to: <55b258c20902080751n7a593aaehc3987fb923516984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20902032200v7893c148we4bca2a86ab645ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <398314.83599.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902061404v337c251fj8f48bd1cdbab8f82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902061646j61c21da7w807b2292ac785513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902061940g55335124o691cc6abeb6538da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902070635s4b1c9f18u6b9326cae22bfa1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902080751n7a593aaehc3987fb923516984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/8 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
> It doesn't actually forbid them. It says "should not but may", which I
> read as intending "should" in the Agoran sense.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>


Not in the original contract. In comex's, yes, but Warrigal's is shall.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: comex

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where are my macks?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread