Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

Elliott Hird on Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:35:47 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:35:41 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wW7YtaKYXQcwwkuI6BppxYhDt7it9SB585VFfdCGPu4=; b=w5NnOzNAPKZ0SvEaLozit6T86G3yhacVdomse6yuO2E7jwwB78FWMocZ+0qNwdDLb3 3lnpxyg4V0yIQMIrkhBJZHGTRlegKcbunnW6ow9thyRK5d0sYI6mBZZEDbdw8Q3URIBk fYccEwHpq9xHOrMZrqQy/p0zNZSp3vqQWDiDI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hm5zK0bWGyTi6DIkJPQyXyovT2D9GubYLs0QxY8Wy9pInwvIHpcC26sONQcjIVcVGP +nTIgFRgJhmY1x0qkekMmWFXXK5UDAb+9GCT3H4M69eHxzdFgYxl4EHmvDtcTYiHBuqN mq/nGyqGF+6Sxp+7MT/t5cIpb4ifJUaXtgJHU=
In-reply-to: <55b258c20902061940g55335124o691cc6abeb6538da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20902032200v7893c148we4bca2a86ab645ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <398314.83599.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902061404v337c251fj8f48bd1cdbab8f82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902061646j61c21da7w807b2292ac785513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902061940g55335124o691cc6abeb6538da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/7 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
> A vanilla non-aggression pact that happens to call its parties
> "losers" is bad for the game?

Non-aggression? You mean like forbidding consistency declarations
just because someone tends to interpret the rules another way?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation... whoops
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Asplosion!!!!!!
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread