Elliott Hird on Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:00:46 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League


2009/2/8 comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Not in the original contract. In comex's, yes, but Warrigal's is shall.
>
> In fact, Marr, my contract is not modified at all from Warrigal's
> except for the enemies list and the name.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>

Then your contract has the same:

Losers shall not claim an answer made by an Enemy to be consistent

Clear as day. What now, teucer? You don't think this is disruptive?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss