Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

Elliott Hird on Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:00:46 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:00:39 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z1O1hHR+IYHAbK/98sCkIspRYf2evttUlcRIezG0XAM=; b=Fa2geR6bHG+mZ0SiBbMuJS0dbgixJFbT2Wajc/FAiTuf9i3FKSHHAaQeXnMJ9W+POZ K759DCrP2ArgKlqLRnjwvh//TMSxuvmr5dJP8Yy134WVquGbZA2xXAfHW6dEv+4lsUiW SpSMa0hGrkEMQCWJ5D1SasWu1eYObV6boENFs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H7suzhPmR3tv+fGZCu/9rGjVoDF42/GZCM8OkSFA1bDUYhyswFMN7QAOAh9lI/2sr2 mHPx5FaGZ18LcA7tyZHIw/MD6BUMUbzqQWNatfd29mKpTj6P/Z11NoVwH3XnCLcVkzkC irNz6yFL9XH/j4Dwwb6tZnsqLxzkgLn4TfwGQ=
In-reply-to: <6bf32280902081155j482cf7as5acf95d30f380906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20902032200v7893c148we4bca2a86ab645ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <398314.83599.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902061404v337c251fj8f48bd1cdbab8f82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902061646j61c21da7w807b2292ac785513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902061940g55335124o691cc6abeb6538da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902070635s4b1c9f18u6b9326cae22bfa1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902080751n7a593aaehc3987fb923516984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0902080918o71acca92me2c1d255fa872252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280902081155j482cf7as5acf95d30f380906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/2/8 comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Not in the original contract. In comex's, yes, but Warrigal's is shall.
>
> In fact, Marr, my contract is not modified at all from Warrigal's
> except for the enemies list and the name.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>

Then your contract has the same:

Losers shall not claim an answer made by an Enemy to be consistent

Clear as day. What now, teucer? You don't think this is disruptive?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where are my macks?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Loose Interpretation League
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread