Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> What aspect of 5E57's "No Player shall be made a Party to a Contract
> without their explicit consent" is being disputed?  The only way I
> see it working is if it's backed by one of the "5E10 is broken and
> lets anyone do anything" interpretations

In some meetings you can indicate your explicit consent to vote by 
raising your hand.

In B, "explicit consent" to join contracts includes breathing.

(reminder: i don't like the line of arguments i'm presenting for this 
case but it's logical)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss