Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183

Elliott Hird on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:26:28 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:26:19 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; bh=KJfi+sHXRqkCvb4wy/mg9fqtLPQfwY3CLm3xWfz6+JM=; b=X5W7iee9HtA9HWu8TaSFJTF8CzAAIME8+nmKBD/0MG8/syrrNUGzzC2Bbk5MgYRFYZ RUJa+FXogJubEmNcZxFsdF39p/2sPkWXc433CSMy2Z8qT3gAEUY8iOmINaDluoBdE2W5 tK3JP24PdwN8bYxKrAdQxbxtBQ4j2DuqtxPCU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:to:x-mailer:from; b=DWkP3ba+hpDiz6JUvZWUpS07OGVD38j0XQEPl9o3xVRJk/YN/AXPPh4WF5pmRtga41 F7w6RC9+jyT0qn4ZG4QOBPVPZXPD8Izsg59Z7HG9H0VlvR66CRL9H+7r6Ox5dLHQzvxb GXIXeDYvjb9p+hres949WyQnwtSdUGOUAIr8A=
In-reply-to: <49669897.20707@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dbedf4da0901070041u6cb0640bn8de3aacd276f06f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4965FBD9.9030904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901081058m712696fayda44fbb45873f61d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49667C87.7020508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901081431n489ee272s566be5f73323d0b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4966844D.8000002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49669897.20707@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


On 9 Jan 2009, at 00:21, Ed Murphy wrote:

What aspect of 5E57's "No Player shall be made a Party to a Contract
without their explicit consent" is being disputed?  The only way I
see it working is if it's backed by one of the "5E10 is broken and
lets anyone do anything" interpretations.


"shall"
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
  - From: Ed Murphy

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread