Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183

Jay Campbell on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:00:02 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:59:56 -0800
In-reply-to: <49669A98.8070900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dbedf4da0901070041u6cb0640bn8de3aacd276f06f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4965FBD9.9030904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901081058m712696fayda44fbb45873f61d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49667C87.7020508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901081431n489ee272s566be5f73323d0b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4966844D.8000002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49669897.20707@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <49669A98.8070900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

(reminder: i don't like the line of arguments i'm presenting for thiscase but it's logical)

... and I'm not arguing comex's original scam anyway (which I forgot thepoint of) but just this Answer's Inconsistency.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 183
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread