Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status

Tyler on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:22:31 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
From: Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:22:27 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=OAloF0AmjprOxAzZN8t9zQc7EeKfLpASbIUrpVJBNW4=; b=LfWGdoPRmzKxblGJ/yTBAUObmHQaEBN9Vt0yXuDFATA6up2d7N1HNsjdQva8FHNlAB fsY/S4ztrku04kt3WguTWPO/WjGe9be/O6nwWH0U5nECeRCUrPKYMa4+vBIsxuD2l6i+ WlOPCjiXTnaak2E0unPSJLtQted9vLVNEkjWI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=e9p02lkCfFSoiFSQBg4K/9HgE3Oj7QqItANSZdwarU0AeuwiqwDabHtTJew77aLhP8 R6vsj+wuMPgm9k+OxNkQpZt4wJkj2GHo3Lttx0idljdnBlSHBL10pgmpQ7MCbYbZKgRJ kzka08mp2a5KvcIkWJiTOPYAZ8UNqCP/L7lEo=
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650901062339q70610e18q7ba11e0a7b590df8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dbedf4da0901050353s151c4547s2bf4160ed0d1485d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0901061511w39031babw7606d574c6df3a05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A9A46D7-D2B4-4D31-9698-E024263CCF68@xxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0901061530w118f5d45p35a60732b5f774f9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901062339q70610e18q7ba11e0a7b590df8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I think I'm finally getting the message. It is not my place to decide if a
Consultation is worthy of judgement; it is my place to give each a fair
hearing with random (qualified) peers for Priests.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > ??? I don't get it.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Elliott Hird <
> > penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 6 Jan 2009, at 23:11, Tyler wrote:
> > >
> > > I plan to ZOT this Consultation as being true if I am the Oracle.
> > >>
> > >
> > > facepalm
> >
>
> I think he means just stop zotting everything, even if you think it's
> obvious or trivial. Maybe don't ZOT more than 1/5 consultations or so
> (barring clear spam, I mean). I would agree with ehird, here.
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hey!
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread