Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status

Tyler on Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:44 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
From: Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:39 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Z5/tWglf3MF0yeMoxHVgB123X9t3uNtkEJnVryKqYO4=; b=g+YvbgtUEYJ9jOJ3jdcfG3Otgn/YPn+9rDPQ9oIFo7szbzyTUVQGbPDnV9SybUbfhF sh7G3WozUAQ3o1jAJVSWSP91Ekz05JJAVVQXUgC3+UytoSSiG7sgpWIXhzTns/P74LuD OI29Np3yZi0acH2F9k/r2MDo9ytl19UVuPB+w=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=ok7M8+WUMZDqNrCKXOY8dTx1AaiKSU1yT6zArumOvdAB/WrIx2IGLt6qfGvq2I/LzE soRlX+z4yrJtPnct7bx4808i/O4uOS+1T9j8HzMtNuCSD19fL//hV/VmqNznJ8gAlyR5 ymlnIc/iEN+OYooaWggpnQkyV50No3UW6CfRI=
In-reply-to: <4A9A46D7-D2B4-4D31-9698-E024263CCF68@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <dbedf4da0901050353s151c4547s2bf4160ed0d1485d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0901061511w39031babw7606d574c6df3a05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A9A46D7-D2B4-4D31-9698-E024263CCF68@xxxxxxxxx>

??? I don't get it.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> On 6 Jan 2009, at 23:11, Tyler wrote:
>
> I plan to ZOT this Consultation as being true if I am the Oracle.
>>
>
> facepalm
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Loss of BP's Ordained Status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread