Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:17 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm not arguing straight-off that the fix failed, but I don't see
> > straight away how it works (sorry, so many scams at the moment that I'm
> > finding their mechansisms hard to work out...). Are you arguing that at
> > least one /other/ rule defines the action in question as a game action,
> > or that the game action would take effect if 5e10 did not exist?
> 
> Approving is defined as a Game Action: "A Player may, as a Game Action
> with 4 Support and no Objections within 2 rdays, Approve a Public
> Display."
Ah, missed that. Good scam, then.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss