Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 21:42 -0500, comex wrote:
> If it worked, this fix by ais523:
> {
> Note that as specific exceptions to this rule, other rules may specify
> other ways in which the gamestate may be
> changed; and Game Actions do not take effect unless either at least
> one other rule defines the action in question as a game action, or
> else the Game Action would take effect if this rule did not exist.
> Also, this rule explicitly defers to rule 5e0, and whenever this rule
> contradicts rule 5e0 this rule takes precedence.
> }
> did not prevent the above scam.
I'm not arguing straight-off that the fix failed, but I don't see
straight away how it works (sorry, so many scams at the moment that I'm
finding their mechansisms hard to work out...). Are you arguing that at
least one /other/ rule defines the action in question as a game action,
or that the game action would take effect if 5e10 did not exist?
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss