comex on Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:18:40 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak
- From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:17:15 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=15vPZB2z3WZg/rOnRSzbMGdvuDINcRFlkYpCGnNo5Rs=; b=YbSK8yrEtsec2sPcEYTOGvi9gSgUL0GzVzGur0UEuL/OJnPrmp/mmKe2v6mhwGU8LV fPIc+Bnz6TOuWyPITnFIlMP02m/O6G3CsTMuWdYrO+HNOvtWLjoTbbfsrjW6l/ieZnAf RAypPuXIIDeS0y3xzEtH3JTwPHU0ZhRZqDPj4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=jtxk1sU09h2lIzALKAseWTumN/7YLXVEJPI8l/IOb9G5RD+f4MiFUnluwh0NWknpWI wVSZeJ0btHXh9jXdKPNbf8ZBUiAJQ8tHTgPmRtyj0cTS6G1EmntdbC3ynFxQqC+JSfJ6 ZSU1foEi4IhmQRjDvd/yG7X8AEZ5WTosbrzoE=
- In-reply-to: <1231285622.8219.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <6bf32280901051842w4ad17e37uff2dfb3ff93e50b6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1231285622.8219.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not arguing straight-off that the fix failed, but I don't see
> straight away how it works (sorry, so many scams at the moment that I'm
> finding their mechansisms hard to work out...). Are you arguing that at
> least one /other/ rule defines the action in question as a game action,
> or that the game action would take effect if 5e10 did not exist?
Approving is defined as a Game Action: "A Player may, as a Game Action
with 4 Support and no Objections within 2 rdays, Approve a Public
Display."
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss