Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 16:03 -0800, Jay Campbell wrote:
> > a) Is there any other non-spoon forum that could be used reliably that
> > doesn't involve IRC? The only reason I'm suggesting it is because while IRC
> > is read accessible, it is a pain to sift through, and you can't package a
> > nice RP together (eg) like you could in an email, or see messages without
> > sifting through tonnes of irrelevant garbage.
> >
> >   
> 
> The google group would be OK if a sufficient number of sane folk were 
> given management access. In this case the most veteran players were in 
> on the scam, so the manager group would have to larger than (for 
> instance) the number of PEPs required for the emergency.
> 
> > b) Perhaps anyone who currently holds the MoM should be either prevented
> > from leaving the contract, or forced to announce eir intention to do so with
> > a long enough delay that they can be impeached before leaving? (Of course
> > that has to be balanced against the potential for a dislike MoM who hasn't
> > done anything wrong to be forced into forfeiting... They need a legitimate
> > escape clause).
> >
> >   
> 
> The time-before-escape could be raised, but yeah, not getting enslaved 
> is the overriding priority.
> 
> > c) The part about five players "indicating that it is their opinion". Can
> > they revise their opinion, or do I accidentally become obliged to forfeit if
> > 3 players indicated their opinion when I was MoM 3 months ago, and 3
> > different ones do so now?
> >   
> 
> Good point. Is "in the same nweek" enough?
Measure it in rdays, ntime is normally screwed up during emergencies.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss