Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

Alex Smith on Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:12:23 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
From: Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:12:10 +0000
In-reply-to: <CD1D3C93-39BF-4BA6-934F-53A1B27E670D@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <49613267.5050300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CB4BCBBE-8B26-4E23-BC40-BAA8195960A2@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901041545g37879385rad625452ed42d816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CD1D3C93-39BF-4BA6-934F-53A1B27E670D@xxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:47 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Damn. Well then, I assign consultation 9999 to Teucer.
##nomic ratification scam?

I think it's generally established (via Feather Pime Taradox rules,
which seem to be general Nomic custom even if nobody but ehird knows
what I'm talking about) that you can't do something impossible that
retroactively causes itself to become possible. At least, it doesn't
work.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread