Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM

Jamie Dallaire on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:39:58 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:39:52 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=7GlXHWqiZwj41oEKUVt2zfut/jU2I935GNdXgxXA43E=; b=Tc9xgT+I+l4KMtz5WNRQk7aOMGjO8iYBu1+UkqL64vE7eFG29FyLUWJkkan9aAQ6// 5b7C4cOgOBZjc95Iq6O7wghO97xMNPu4RYf0Ak0NN/gHJXL9bgE4b5egEzWGL3c1S9Aw B74VXHZIOI4es5rvugYyaT+/SoiPVTRc1NLwg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=mpTLYrcmRYKiLLOFzQ+jd7lJGcw51l6ZXtxPHHMZvVXBFrrd+rrlL/kpdXUlrV7mzH t1bSbXoo2Ba6nWKqjGpEYQbFZ2pdIPnQI8t2VoQ9sCHMIr5M2SKegJ4/yUot0FidOfKE guZLGj2/7Ej4MLZXR547LfmV+770cS0D1JtSU=
In-reply-to: <49614E63.2070807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4961499A.3060505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840901041546r647c5f0p6ae3e4a9fb1384fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901041555r5c92991au9ce1e3b32868282f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49614E63.2070807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> they revise their opinion, or do I accidentally become obliged to forfeit
>> if
>> 3 players indicated their opinion when I was MoM 3 months ago, and 3
>> different ones do so now?
>>
>>
> c) The part about five players "indicating that it is their opinion". Can
>
> Good point. Is "in the same nweek" enough?


sounds good
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread