|
Craig Daniel on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:02:12 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
- From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:02:05 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=YyYdd5y739tS/DmVD3w9RB+HXk5HNl5etF4UhCIg2kE=; b=CJCsuDFJH4I6+2xXB+/wmZQex7i/SH83E/ROT85J3wZ3Cu45c/uRg44MUFRdZ43J8B ZcJuBn0prZAXtja9TXQwkkm6ybySpMxPSUOvYagusLXakAN1hRE0JmwfafsyFJ1Ltn// f+4YRQ/1//VTbn+rtPxMGz67jY4owNBmWqLVc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=W02S9qCBOJjeJTwJVzM5aXlVzYW8bN3dSSTgd24hawS+Lpw4BiCEf1J7W/e/oEOV9X 5xb5Z+yTflnkcZHeCnWdIR6Z44KdXjfg3aKJGZYze9FSl7wS3xZS4AqACjOKJFZdBFvn 17/YJ92ByGA5vqMYGqyiIXvn379YQ4IFTXIJg=
- In-reply-to: <496139B1.5010903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <49613267.5050300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CB4BCBBE-8B26-4E23-BC40-BAA8195960A2@xxxxxxxxx> <496139B1.5010903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is all completely invalid. ehird forfeited and is not currently a
> player.
If e were a player, e could not have legally assigned it to emself.
I do not claim eir answer Inconsistent, as to do so would be to admit
that it exists from any legal standpoint. It does not.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss