Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jay Campbell wrote:
> It can't be declared inconsistent. Any declarations of such should not 
> be construed as acceptance that the original consultation was a valid 
> game document.
It is a valid game document. I submitted it, I'm a valid player, and it 
is in the proper format. If ehird is not a Player, the Consultation was 
not assigned, but that does not mean that the Consultation itself does 
not exist.

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss