Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > Correct. The fact you unambiguously forfeited like a pansy is the 
> > reason you aren't a player.
>
> The forfeit was ambiguous.


Nope. No matter how many times you say that, it's not true, so I'll respond.

> > Stating repeatedly that you are a player and pretending to take game 
> > actions does not make you a player.
>
> I've offered actual reasoning. You can disagree, but stop being an 
> idiot on purpose to further your personal viewpoint.


My "personal viewpoint" is backed by the rules and the majority of the 
player base. Shall we put it to a vote?

Also - after this blatant quit-in-a-huff then 
scam-to-return-before-reregistration-limit I urge everyone to vote 
against ehird's reinstatement as a player by proposal, especially after 
attempting the break the MoQ rules multiple times in one message 
(self-assignment, "personal interest") in the process.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss