Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

Jay Campbell on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:22:03 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:21:56 -0800
In-reply-to: <55b258c20901041819u3aa22739l73ce83e7773a7327@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49613267.5050300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CB4BCBBE-8B26-4E23-BC40-BAA8195960A2@xxxxxxxxx> <496139B1.5010903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20901041802u3faf3057m6fb790e3a40baaa0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49616AC4.3040802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0901041809m4dd809c5lb03c57e63a84b8d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20901041819u3aa22739l73ce83e7773a7327@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

I attempt to submit the following Consultation. I don't think I
succeed, because I specify an invalid Unbeliever.

{Has there been a Consultation 9999?
Unbeliever: ehird}



This action fails, the Unbeliever must be a Player.

[you'd think i'd be tired of this by now]
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread