Elliott Hird on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:36:29 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks 


On 1 Jan 2009, at 00:31, Ed Murphy wrote:


Possibly, but what's more directly relevant to this case is this
clause from Rule 2162:

      If an instance of a switch would otherwise fail to have a
      possible value, it comes to have its default value.


but only legal entities can own mack;

Nobody is not a legal entity, yo.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss