Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 16:31 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Elliott Hird
> > <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 31 Dec 2008, at 21:05, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> >>> We need to learn our lesson and define that when we make new game objects
> >>> (or explicitly make old things into game objects)...
> >>>
> >>> This comes up every few months in a slightly different form.
> >> Welp, I think the ownership consultation is PARADOX. :)
> > 
> > We need a Rule 1586.
> 
> Possibly, but what's more directly relevant to this case is this
> clause from Rule 2162:
> 
>       If an instance of a switch would otherwise fail to have a
>       possible value, it comes to have its default value.

Wrong nomic.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss