Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

Alex Smith on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:19:20 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
From: Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:18:57 +0000
In-reply-to: <285c99840812311617s1409886bp1f630745b1aeff6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20812311526y2983f8a8i69bff80bca335064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812311609i557c3f34tc2acaf732884cfa5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495C09E3.2060407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812311617s1409886bp1f630745b1aeff6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 16:17 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote:
> 2008/12/31, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > I claim this INCONSISTENT. Consultations do not have such an effect on game
> > state*, they're merely advisory.
> >
> > * Except for punishments
> 
> 
> Consultations have the effect of setting precedent.
> 
> Would you rather I phrase it like this:
> As Punishment, I assign a Fine of all macks formerly owned by ehird on any
> legal entity which possesses them and on B Nomic generally for all unowned
> macks. (I obviously can't do that, btw)
> 
Someone bring back Oracularities. Please.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread