Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy

Jay Campbell on Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:59:59 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:59:53 -0800
In-reply-to: <285c99840812300954y62c72766g99f87470e535c083@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dbedf4da0812300210s43cf083cm3ab5e30d4609dc59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495A1C57.5010706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0812300559n533a9b9axbc2cec823fe01302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <70D36D21-3067-423D-ACDD-954586B1AE93@xxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812300954y62c72766g99f87470e535c083@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

Charles Schaefer wrote:

Here's how I look at this whole revolution (at least right now, I've already
changed my mind a couple of times): I'm a little annoyed at being left out

(I don't know how the cabal members were chosen),

You were on the short list but weren't one of the five required thatshowed up on IRC, which seems to be a requirement for spawning conspiracies.


Also, there was no cabal.

j

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fixing B Nomic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread