| Tyler on Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:00:01 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy |
Oh. Heh heh. That takes a lot out of my three paragraphs of complaint. I guess it's not such a bad scam then, you know. As long as you don't do anything crazy like add the Mao rules. But it's a shame some people had to resign over it. (Not to mention the delay.) Then there's still the issue of whether it worked. My PS. I probably missed someone's Consultation too. On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:04 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tyler wrote: > >> And why doesn't your scam patch the Ruleset to disallow itself from >> happening again? >> > It does, look at the changes to Rule 0. > > -- > -- > 0x44; > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss