Tyler on Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:00:01 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy


Oh. Heh heh. That takes a lot out of my three paragraphs of complaint. I
guess it's not such a bad scam then, you know. As long as you don't do
anything crazy like add the Mao rules. But it's a shame some people had to
resign over it. (Not to mention the delay.)

Then there's still the issue of whether it worked. My PS. I probably missed
someone's Consultation too.

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:04 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Tyler wrote:
>
>> And why doesn't your scam patch the Ruleset to disallow itself from
>> happening again?
>>
> It does, look at the changes to Rule 0.
>
> --
> --
> 0x44;
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss