Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy

0x44 on Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:06:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:04:23 -0600
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0812300210s43cf083cm3ab5e30d4609dc59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <dbedf4da0812300210s43cf083cm3ab5e30d4609dc59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

Tyler wrote:

And why doesn't your scam patch the Ruleset to disallow itself from happening again?

It does, look at the changes to Rule 0.

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Laser sharpener
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fixing B Nomic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Fixing B Nomic
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not Happy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread