Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation

["Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> Thinking about this, there is only one real point of contention here,
>> which is whether a forum counts as reasonably accessible if it could be
>> reasonably accessed by a PEP who knows its location, or whether the
>> required standard is of a forum which can be reasonably accessed by a
>> PEP with no information at all.
>
> Or (as in the MD5 case) with incomplete information that would require
> lots of effort to complete.

I think it's quite accessible. At least I assume it is. But I also
think J failed to notify me of what the forum is, and it is thus
invalid. I will find thus if assigned to judge the Consultation.

Now, e could very easily make it public what the forum is, in
*explicit* terms, and then only tell a few people a password needed to
access it. So I assume that even though e did it wrong, only the
Secret Forum Cabal are going to be able to participate in the
emergency in any meaningful way.

I don't really mind, though. I trust J to form that cabal in such a
way that it's going to be a group of people prepared to fix the urgent
problems as they see them and, I hope, do no damage to the rest of the
ruleset. I know there are things about it J opposes, such as the Grid,
but I'm assuming he's not going to attempt an undemocratic means of
subverting it, because he cares too much for the well-being of B to do
so.

In any case, though, I'm under no illusions about getting a chance to
participate in this emergency.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss