Re: [s-d] [s-b] Scam theft

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Flawless victory. But now we have TWO dictators.



Alex Smith wrote:
> [Note: This quite possibly doesn't work. I'm sure ehird's dictatorship
> failed, this might succeed (at least it doesn't fail due to not being
> specified in the rules).]
>
> I create a rule whose text reads, in its entirety, "The player named
> ais523 may change the gamestate in any way, at any time."
>
> Unlike ehird's failed dictatorship (see ##nomic), this /is/ an action
> "specified by the rules" and thus a Game Action.
>
> I win by Dictatorship.
>
> I append to rule 5e10 "Note that as specific exceptions to this rule,
> other rules may specify other ways in which the gamestate may be
> changed; and Game Actions do not take effect unless either at least one
> other rule defines the action in question as a game action, or else the
> Game Action would take effect if this rule did not exist. Also, this
> rule explicitly defers to rule 5e0, and whenever this rule contradicts
> rule 5e0 this rule takes precedence." [This should hopefully fix the
> loophole; more important, I'm trying to make sure it doesn't leave B in
> an unchangeable state.]
>
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss