| Tyler on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:11:26 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] contract |
No, I don't know of a rule that prohibits rule-changing. But just because there's nothing that says you can't, doesn't mean you can. I'm pretty sure we've been over this once or twice before. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, transaction fails because you can't change rules willy nilly like > > that. Wooble only did it via Contractual obligation automation. > > I think you're correct. But I can't find the rule that says so. If you > can, tell us which it is? Then we can see whether it takes precedence > over the contract automation rule and thus prevents Wooble's takeover. > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss