Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Haha. Hey, if other people join, then BP could, with his Overbar, entangle
them (with support). Then they would each have less voting power than
normal, if my calculations are correct.

If not for the Antiplayer, you might had a good trick to get people a little
more voting power.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Whoa. Does this mean the Beast is obligated to vote by Contract, and
> > therefore does? The wording of the Contract isn't very clear in this
> case.
>
> Yes. The Beast is a player, so its contractually-defined obligations
> happen automatically.
>
> ...and unless somebody else joins the contract in question it means
> I'm going to be voting FOR all proposals this nweek, while the inverse
> of my platform is the Beast's ballot.
>
>  - teucer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss