Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse

Craig Daniel on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:21:46 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:21:41 -0500
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0811171247s7ebeb31cw198c67ad036872b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <491DF82D.3080309@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20811141451m6fe1010aw230844aa31c6d272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20811162313t3353c29fk8f1b14f3edb9bd61@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0811171247s7ebeb31cw198c67ad036872b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Whoa. Does this mean the Beast is obligated to vote by Contract, and
> therefore does? The wording of the Contract isn't very clear in this case.

Yes. The Beast is a player, so its contractually-defined obligations
happen automatically.

...and unless somebody else joins the contract in question it means
I'm going to be voting FOR all proposals this nweek, while the inverse
of my platform is the Beast's ballot.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse
  - From: Tyler

References:
- [s-d] Proto: Beating a dead horse
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Buying Beast votes
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Repeal tomfoolery
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proto: Beating a dead horse
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread