Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset

Jay Campbell on Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:06:26 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:06:19 -0800
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650811151403j77ea5f8r1fd5727019536439@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <491E42AA.6020602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20811151257w6dec06ecue42e1ce8907b7b1b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <491F3A87.2020307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <491F3AD9.2020603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650811151338n4bce7f02x540fcde3322e262f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <491F4253.6050002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650811151346x79b41692i519a7fb85bcfcee7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1226785776.8273.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650811151403j77ea5f8r1fd5727019536439@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

>
> I think I found a way to deal with all this tomfoolery. It cannot be
> determined with certainty whether the 2199 game action (or all those at
> 00:00:00.5 and thereabouts) succeeds or fails.
>
> Therefore the transaction fails.
>   

It's impossible to tell with certainty whether any future scheduled 
action will happen. 2199 isn't special.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
  - From: Ed Murphy

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Fix contracts
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoM reset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread